﻿{"id":9055,"date":"2020-12-23T11:20:00","date_gmt":"2020-12-23T10:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=9055"},"modified":"2024-08-20T14:31:10","modified_gmt":"2024-08-20T13:31:10","slug":"mne-benefit-rbmar","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=9055","title":{"rendered":"MNE benefit RBMar"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=7484\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Proposal for a Global Taxation System<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u00a0&#8211; DAGTVA truth table &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>DAGTVA\u00ae &#8211; Distribution of MNE profits<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"41\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>No.<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td width=\"332\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Problems exposed, requests, constraints and subjects<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td width=\"60\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Origin<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td width=\"24\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Pg<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td width=\"24\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Li<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<td width=\"72\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Doc<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"41\">43<\/td>\n<td width=\"332\"><strong>M<\/strong>t <strong>A<\/strong> \u2013 Set new<strong> r<\/strong>ules of profit distribution.<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">Pillar 1<\/td>\n<td width=\"24\">8<\/td>\n<td width=\"24\">39<\/td>\n<td width=\"72\">RBMar<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/documents\/wstax\/unified_approach_dagtva.doc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Quote<\/a> :\u00a0\u00a0<span style=\"color: #993300;\"><em>New and revised profit allocation rules <\/em><\/span><\/strong>(<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=8916\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>RBRge<\/em><\/a>)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>27. <\/strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">As noted, given that the new taxing right would create a nexus for an MNE group even in the absence of a physical presence<\/span> (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=9037\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RBEla<\/a> \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=8214\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RLPph<\/a> \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=8310\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RLCpp<\/a> \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=8321\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RLNet<\/a>)<span style=\"color: #993300;\">, it would be impossible to use the existing rules to allocate profit to this new nexus<\/span> (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=9006\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RBAbt<\/a>) <span style=\"color: #993300;\">in cases where no functions are performed, no assets are used, and no risks are assumed in the market jurisdictions. <span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">Therefore, new profit allocation rules are required for Amount A<\/span><\/span> (RBMar).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>As is detailed in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=8412\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>RBMap<\/em><\/a> page, first we must consider <span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">to obtain fiscal legal certainty by wanting to retrocede to a market State profits of any kind, legally acquired,<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"> <strong>is neither the problem nor the business of an MNE<\/strong><\/span><\/span>, but that of a State which is aware about the turnover achieved locally by these MNEs and has not properly taxed companies operating in its territory in order to need to be returnded all or part of the taxes collected elsewhere, to balance its incomes.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"background-color: #ffff00; color: #ff0000;\"><strong>It is not the role of an MNE to return a profit margin legally acquired in another jurisdiction. How and by what right would it do it?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>But we see that in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=7563\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">the DAGTVA calculation of transfer prices<\/a> , there is <span style=\"color: #ff0000; background-color: #ffff00;\"><strong>no planned retrocession of profits, whether they are residual or no<\/strong><strong>t<\/strong> <\/span>and that the notion of <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong><em>presumed<\/em><\/strong><\/span> by this fact does not exist and even could not exist due to the accounting accuracy of the cross-border transaction in a transactional tax system. With DAGTVA,<span style=\"color: #ff0000; background-color: #ffff00;\"> there is no retrocession of the direct taxation of MNEs comes from the sharing of this taxation into a tax on profits better distributed in each State concerned by the transaction.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">The DAGTVA process makes this retrocession unnecessary in B\u00b2B transactions<\/span><\/strong><\/span>, due to the fact that a permanent establishment recognized in the market jurisdiction where the MNE will be taxed at the level that the local tax authorities have decided, if is required.<\/p>\n<p>We can also read in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=8654\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">RBMcs<\/a> section :<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab\u00a0<em>From a pure tax standpoint, the fact of wanting to return an additional profit in a foreign jurisdiction can only be done at the level of the State tax authorities and in no case as explained below by the MNE, which would imply that firstly, this profit was calculated by the local tax authorities, following a tax declaration by the local entity of the MNE (which is not certain) and necessarily over a very long tax period over accounting years which can be fenced. Secondly that this taxable additional benefit identified was notified, by return, to the MNE, with a transfer of it at destination a foreign jurisdiction, where the execution of the latter will be difficult to control, the whole with an impossible approval of the authorities of taxation on the part of the recalcitrant States with the transparency and the shipment of a fiscal windfall to which they are very \u2018attached\u2019! <span style=\"color: #ff0000; background-color: #ffff00;\">If such processes were put in place,MNEs would manage to declare substantial profits to be returned in tax havens with a worse situation than before!<\/span><\/em>\u00ab\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Note:<\/strong><\/span> This section does not deal with B\u00b2C transactions where a business, which may be an MNE, sells to an end consumer in a market State where it has no physical presence.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=5472\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> This subject is treated globally in this page<\/a> by referring to<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/dessins\/us\/wsm_b2c_mkplace_seller-uk_wayfair.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> B\u00b2C slideshows like this one<\/a> , but also in sections which make the device applicable in all the conditions of its internationalization but does not authorize,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=9037\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> except agreement of the taxation authorities<\/a> (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/dessins\/us\/wsm_b2b_mkplace_dom-usa_wayfair.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">slide show in reference<\/a> \u2013<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong><em> slide 14<\/em><\/strong><\/span>) in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/documents\/wstax\/articles-model-tax-convention-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Article 7 of the OECD conventions<\/a> , to allow an ultimate consumer to export a product he has sold.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=7897\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Back to the truth table<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">**********<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Proposal for a Global Taxation System \u00a0&#8211; DAGTVA truth table &#8211; DAGTVA\u00ae &#8211; Distribution of MNE profits No. Problems exposed, requests, constraints and subjects Origin Pg Li Doc 43 Mt A \u2013 Set new rules of profit distribution. Pillar 1 &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/?page_id=9055\">Continuer la lecture <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":7897,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9055","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9055"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9055\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11563,"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9055\/revisions\/11563"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7897"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dagtva.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}